I would experiment yourself and find a workflow that suits you. Its all very subjective and down to an individuals preference. Having used it on my culled images (It can take quite a time to process), I then decide whether I'm going to process the DXO conversion or the Lightroom one, 90% of the time I head for the DXO one.īut all of this RAW processing depends on what type of images you want to produce, ultimate detail isn't the be and end all, especially with skin tones where a softer approach can be more pleasing. It too can oversharpen on occassions, and sometimes the greens get a bit carried away (easily corrected), but the level of detail it extracts is second to none. It is a very effective RAW processor, and excellent when treating higher ISO images. I have though been experimenting the DXO PureRAW, the latest version is used as a Plug-In with Lightroom making the use a lot easier. PureRAW is a RAW file pre-processor which removes noise and corrects. Probably the nearest comparable of these to On1 NoNoise AI is DxO PureRAW. Compare this to DxO DeepPRIME and you’ll find that it’s a technology used in a couple of DxO products (currently PhotoLab and PureRAW). More detail can be obtained using the Enhance feature.Ĭapture One does seem to extract slightly more detail but I can't get on with the user-interface, I've been locked into Lightroom for far too long. On1 NoNoise AI is a dedicated noise reduction application. Like says it oversharpens Fuji files on Import, I have set up a preset that is used as an import preset (auto detecting a list of Fuji cameras I have entered) that significantly reduces sharpening on import. I have been a Lightroom user for 10+ yeras, I like it, but although it is better than it used to be with Fuji-X files, it still doesn't drag as much detail out of the images as some other RAW processors, but it does create pefectly acceptable (and pleasing images)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |